Watch the ants. They venture out into the world looking
for something and counting on their limited instincts for survival.
Down in the hole, there's a culture that unifies their society. They
have short memories, small data banks, and primitive behaviors that
have amazingly sustained the species for millions of years. The genus
formicidae is a good example of an adaptive survivor.
But, there are no ant bicycles nor refrigerators.
Imagine what a colony could do with a refrigerator or electric
lights. Do you think the Georgia fire ant army plans for its next
meal with strategic emplacements and tactics borrowed from Sun Tsu?
Is there success due to genetic probabilities that worked out just
right? How much of ant history comes from learning? Did evolution
play a role in ant development? Did body language and pheromone
communication develop little by little over millions of years, and was it pursued by an
intelligent hunt searching for improved ways of survival? Did
advancements in food gathering and survival rates build generation
after generation on the developments of previous generations? Did
lessons learned by one formicidae subfamily help other subfamilies
survive?
I watched the black carpenter ants march off through my
wood pile following seemingly known trails to look for food, like
dead insects and other tidbits. It seemed they could work
independently and in pairs to do their jobs. Even though it seems
these ants I watched knew how to find suitable home sites and prepare
dens for their simple lifestyles. They seemed to be happy in their
work and the epitome of cooperation. I wondered if they would
cooperate with me if we could talk about it.
The formicidae cannot think thoughts about bicycles nor
refrigerators. That makes me suspect humans can't conceive of bigger
concepts, either. I'm talking about concepts so big and unknowable
that neither I nor any other human can imagine them. But, I'm going
to try to take a stab at the unknowable. That's what these thoughts
are all about.
I think there are higher forms of reality somewhere.
Forms we cannot imagine. The forms probably are not like us, not
visible, not warm nor energetic. Maybe there's matter involved or
maybe there's energy, or something unknown, but those are primitive concepts for the higher
reality. It's a sure thing an unknown entity is invisible to the
human eye, and it's undetectable. I wonder if the carpenter ants
suspect we're up here riding bicycles and driving cars? It's probably
foolish to waste time wondering about some unknowable thing, but it's
a fun mystery to spend time with.
How would an ant go about nailing down an answer to some
unknowable mystery? Well, if the ant cared enough, he could allot a
few minutes to the job. He could start with the known and do what my
art professor suggested during his lecture on creativity: assume the
opposite of everything you know. Go from there. The ant might think
there's something so big or so small it can't be sensed by the
available sensory mechanisms. He could suspect temperature might be
involved. Maybe there's something so cold or hot it's unapproachable.
Complex structures might be the answer; something so complicated it
would appear to be infinite or endless or everywhere. Kinda like
gravity. Ants know about gravity.
There are things we humans think we know. But, the truth
is that we only know about them. Like electromagnetic
radiation...radio signals. We know how to generate radio signals and
we know we can detect them from satellites billions of miles away.
What about that? You might sense that I'm impressed about our ability
to know so much about something and still not know what it really
is. I am. Do you suppose an ant can be impressed? We don't know,
but I'd say even though ants know about gravity, they don't know what
gravity is. We don't know, either. Wait! What if ants...
7 comments:
Ants probably know. All mine do.
When you talk about infinity, you're getting into something you're completely zero on. I mean zero divided by zero. Naught.
The something you're talking about has already been discovered. Unfortunately, it can't be discussed in agnostic lingo. You are one, aren't you? Bet you can't answer that one in six words or less.
Regular people shouldn't be trying to find something they're not entitled to know. This is something we're not entitled to know. You're not even capable of knowing even if it was right in front of your face. Nobody is.
Is there going to be a Tarantino movie about this?
The reason your art professor suggested you try doing the opposite of what you normally do is that what you normally do has also been done thousands of times before. That's why it's a dead end. It's been thought of before. It's pretty cool, though, about the ants. I'd propose that there's something you don't seem to know. There's the end someplace. Maybe there's not more, like energy or something. Maybe nothing would ever be so important it would be worth it. I think you might be obsessing over something dumb. Go draw some pictures and you'll figure it out.
You have good information. It ties into a point, too.
Post a Comment